Volume Monitor
Live crypto data · 8 exchanges

BTW Liquidation Map (Estimated)

An estimated liquidation map for BTW: the modelled value of positions that would be liquidated at each price if it got there, longs below the current price and shorts above, from positions opened in the chosen window across Binance, Bybit, Hyperliquid, Bitget, Gate, HTX, MEXC, KuCoin.

The model places $445K of long and $82K of short liquidation levels for BTW from positions opened in the last 7 days (high leverage (≥25×)). Within 10% of the 1.226 price: about $445K of longs below and $82K of shorts above. The densest modelled clusters are longs near 1.168 (-4.75%) and shorts near 1.235 (+0.75%).

Model est-1.0+hl-2026-09-27-25xHigh leverage (≥25×) · last 7 daysOpen interest $202.20MAs of 00:08 UTC

This is a model estimate for all tracked exchanges, not real positions.

Long levelswithin −10%
$445K
densest near 1.168
Short levelswithin +10%
$82K
densest near 1.235
Modelled liquidationslast 7 days
$487K
exchanges reported $289K
Open interestall exchanges
$202.20M
$445K long · $82K short levels

BTW liquidation map · ±25% · 7 days

$13K$111K$25K$223K$38K$334K$50K$445KLongs at 1.103–1.110 (-9.75%): ≈ $4,970 modelledLongs at 1.110–1.116 (-9.25%): ≈ $6,144 modelledLongs at 1.116–1.122 (-8.75%): ≈ $6,278 modelledLongs at 1.122–1.128 (-8.25%): ≈ $6,320 modelledLongs at 1.128–1.134 (-7.75%): ≈ $20K modelledLongs at 1.134–1.140 (-7.25%): ≈ $31K modelledLongs at 1.140–1.146 (-6.75%): ≈ $36K modelledLongs at 1.146–1.152 (-6.25%): ≈ $18K modelledLongs at 1.152–1.159 (-5.75%): ≈ $23K modelledLongs at 1.159–1.165 (-5.25%): ≈ $45K modelledLongs at 1.165–1.171 (-4.75%): ≈ $50K modelledLongs at 1.171–1.177 (-4.25%): ≈ $43K modelledLongs at 1.177–1.183 (-3.75%): ≈ $29K modelledLongs at 1.183–1.189 (-3.25%): ≈ $37K modelledLongs at 1.189–1.195 (-2.75%): ≈ $37K modelledLongs at 1.195–1.201 (-2.25%): ≈ $33K modelledLongs at 1.201–1.208 (-1.75%): ≈ $16K modelledLongs at 1.208–1.214 (-1.25%): ≈ $2,474 modelledLongs at 1.214–1.220 (-0.75%): ≈ $77 modelledShorts at 1.226–1.232 (+0.25%): ≈ $2,123 modelledShorts at 1.232–1.238 (+0.75%): ≈ $26K modelledShorts at 1.238–1.244 (+1.25%): ≈ $20K modelledShorts at 1.244–1.250 (+1.75%): ≈ $14K modelledShorts at 1.250–1.257 (+2.25%): ≈ $11K modelledShorts at 1.257–1.263 (+2.75%): ≈ $5,688 modelledShorts at 1.263–1.269 (+3.25%): ≈ $2,473 modelledShorts at 1.269–1.275 (+3.75%): ≈ $575 modelled0.9195-25.00%1.042-15.00%1.165-5.00%1.287+5.00%1.410+15.00%1.532+25.00%BTW 1.226Model est-1.0+hl-2026-09-27-25x · ≥25× · estimate$25K$223K$50K$445KLongs at 1.103–1.110 (-9.75%): ≈ $4,970 modelledLongs at 1.110–1.116 (-9.25%): ≈ $6,144 modelledLongs at 1.116–1.122 (-8.75%): ≈ $6,278 modelledLongs at 1.122–1.128 (-8.25%): ≈ $6,320 modelledLongs at 1.128–1.134 (-7.75%): ≈ $20K modelledLongs at 1.134–1.140 (-7.25%): ≈ $31K modelledLongs at 1.140–1.146 (-6.75%): ≈ $36K modelledLongs at 1.146–1.152 (-6.25%): ≈ $18K modelledLongs at 1.152–1.159 (-5.75%): ≈ $23K modelledLongs at 1.159–1.165 (-5.25%): ≈ $45K modelledLongs at 1.165–1.171 (-4.75%): ≈ $50K modelledLongs at 1.171–1.177 (-4.25%): ≈ $43K modelledLongs at 1.177–1.183 (-3.75%): ≈ $29K modelledLongs at 1.183–1.189 (-3.25%): ≈ $37K modelledLongs at 1.189–1.195 (-2.75%): ≈ $37K modelledLongs at 1.195–1.201 (-2.25%): ≈ $33K modelledLongs at 1.201–1.208 (-1.75%): ≈ $16K modelledLongs at 1.208–1.214 (-1.25%): ≈ $2,474 modelledLongs at 1.214–1.220 (-0.75%): ≈ $77 modelledShorts at 1.226–1.232 (+0.25%): ≈ $2,123 modelledShorts at 1.232–1.238 (+0.75%): ≈ $26K modelledShorts at 1.238–1.244 (+1.25%): ≈ $20K modelledShorts at 1.244–1.250 (+1.75%): ≈ $14K modelledShorts at 1.250–1.257 (+2.25%): ≈ $11K modelledShorts at 1.257–1.263 (+2.75%): ≈ $5,688 modelledShorts at 1.263–1.269 (+3.25%): ≈ $2,473 modelledShorts at 1.269–1.275 (+3.75%): ≈ $575 modelled0.9195-25.00%1.073-12.50%1.379+12.50%1.532+25.00%BTW 1.226Model est-1.0+hl-2026-09-27-25x · ≥25× · estimate
Longs liquidated (price falls)Shorts liquidated (price rises)Cumulative from the price outwards (right axis)

Model est-1.0+hl-2026-09-27-25x · High leverage (≥25×) · positions opened in the last 7 days. Each bar is 0.006130 wide. Outside the chart: ≈ $0 of longs and $0 of shorts.

See how these levels built up over time on the BTW liquidation heatmap.

Densest long liquidation levels

below 1.226
PriceDistance≈ Modelled
1.165–1.171-4.75%$50K
1.159–1.165-5.25%$45K
1.171–1.177-4.25%$43K
1.183–1.189-3.25%$37K
1.189–1.195-2.75%$37K

Densest short liquidation levels

above 1.226
PriceDistance≈ Modelled
1.232–1.238+0.75%$26K
1.238–1.244+1.25%$20K
1.244–1.250+1.75%$14K
1.250–1.257+2.25%$11K
1.257–1.263+2.75%$5,688

Modelled liquidations near the price

High leverage (≥25×) · last 7 days
Price moveLongs liquidated (price falls)Shorts liquidated (price rises)
±2%$14K$64K
±5%$254K$82K
±10%$445K$82K

How this estimate is made

Model est-1.0+hl-2026-09-27-25x

Inputs are the open interest, prices and volume this site records from Binance, Bybit, Hyperliquid, Bitget, Gate, HTX, MEXC, KuCoin. Every rise in open interest is booked as a new long and a new short at the period's volume-weighted price; falls in open interest close positions proportionally; positions also decay with a multi-day half-life; and a level is removed once the price trades through it (those are the "modelled liquidations"). Liquidation prices are spread over this distance-from-entry distribution, measured on real Hyperliquid positions and cut to positions at ≥25× leverage:

Liquidation distance from entryShare of new positions
0% – 2%12.0%
2% – 4%4.7%

Known limits: prices are last-trade bars averaged across exchanges, not mark prices; opens and closes inside one open-interest snapshot (5 minutes on Binance) cancel out; one distribution is used for every coin and both sides. USD values are "≈ modelled", best read as relative intensity. Full method and a daily accuracy scoreboard against real liquidations: liquidation heatmap methodology. Estimates may be materially wrong; not financial advice.

BTW liquidation map FAQ

Is this BTW liquidation map real data?

No, it is a model estimate. Exchanges do not publish where their users' positions would be liquidated, so every liquidation heatmap for Binance or Bybit (including the well-known ones) is a model. This one starts from real data: the open interest changes, prices and trading volume this site records from the exchanges' public APIs. Actual liquidations are usually lower, because most positions are closed long before they are liquidated.

How is it calculated?

Every rise in open interest is a new long and a new short, entered at that period's volume-weighted price. The model spreads their liquidation prices over a distance-to-liquidation distribution measured on real Hyperliquid positions (74.0% of new positions within 50% of entry; the rest are too far away or can't be liquidated). Falls in open interest close positions proportionally, positions also decay with a 5-day half-life, and a level is removed once the price trades through it. The model version on the chart says which formula and distribution were used.

What do the ranges and the ≥25× view mean?

The range is the replay window: the map shows positions opened in the last 12 hours to 30 days. All leverage uses the whole distribution; High leverage (≥25×) keeps only positions liquidated within 4% of their entry, the short-term levels that get hit first.

How is this different from the Hyperliquid liquidation map?

Hyperliquid is an on-chain exchange, so its positions and their liquidation prices are public. The Hyperliquid liquidation map adds up the real positions of tracked wallets on Hyperliquid only (there is none for BTW, which has no Hyperliquid perp). This page is an estimate for all tracked exchanges together, Binance, Bybit and Hyperliquid included. Use both: where they agree, the level is more likely real.

Can I trade on it?

Treat it as context, not a signal. Clusters show where forced closes may bunch up if the price gets there; they don't predict that it will. Nothing here is financial advice, estimates may be materially wrong, and derivatives trading can lose more than your deposit.