Volume Monitor
Live crypto data · 8 exchanges

TAO Liquidation Map (Estimated)

An estimated liquidation map for Bittensor: the modelled value of positions that would be liquidated at each price if it got there, longs below the current price and shorts above, from positions opened in the chosen window across Binance, Bybit, Hyperliquid, Bitget, Gate, HTX, MEXC, KuCoin. For real positions instead of a model, see the TAO liquidation map on Hyperliquid.

The model places $330K of long and $667K of short liquidation levels for TAO from positions opened in the last 30 days (high leverage (≥25×)). Within 10% of the 317.98 price: about $330K of longs below and $667K of shorts above. The densest modelled clusters are longs near 315.59 (-0.75%) and shorts near 331.49 (+4.25%).

Model est-1.0+hl-2026-09-27-25xHigh leverage (≥25×) · last 30 daysOpen interest $301.59MAs of 23:11 UTC

This is a model estimate for all tracked exchanges, not real positions. The TAO liquidation map on Hyperliquid shows the real liquidation prices of tracked Hyperliquid wallets instead.

Long levelswithin −10%
$330K
densest near 315.59
Short levelswithin +10%
$667K
densest near 331.49
Modelled liquidationslast 30 days
$895K
exchanges reported $256K
Open interestall exchanges
$301.59M
$330K long · $667K short levels

TAO liquidation map · ±25% · 30 days

$28K$167K$55K$334K$83K$500K$110K$667KLongs at 305.26–306.85 (-3.75%): ≈ $2,296 modelledLongs at 306.85–308.44 (-3.25%): ≈ $5,672 modelledLongs at 308.44–310.03 (-2.75%): ≈ $12K modelledLongs at 310.03–311.62 (-2.25%): ≈ $32K modelledLongs at 311.62–313.21 (-1.75%): ≈ $54K modelledLongs at 313.21–314.80 (-1.25%): ≈ $66K modelledLongs at 314.80–316.39 (-0.75%): ≈ $97K modelledLongs at 316.39–317.98 (-0.25%): ≈ $60K modelledShorts at 319.57–321.16 (+0.75%): ≈ $10K modelledShorts at 321.16–322.75 (+1.25%): ≈ $19K modelledShorts at 322.75–324.34 (+1.75%): ≈ $44K modelledShorts at 324.34–325.93 (+2.25%): ≈ $59K modelledShorts at 325.93–327.52 (+2.75%): ≈ $53K modelledShorts at 327.52–329.11 (+3.25%): ≈ $37K modelledShorts at 329.11–330.70 (+3.75%): ≈ $85K modelledShorts at 330.70–332.29 (+4.25%): ≈ $110K modelledShorts at 332.29–333.88 (+4.75%): ≈ $101K modelledShorts at 333.88–335.47 (+5.25%): ≈ $66K modelledShorts at 335.47–337.06 (+5.75%): ≈ $37K modelledShorts at 337.06–338.65 (+6.25%): ≈ $24K modelledShorts at 338.65–340.24 (+6.75%): ≈ $17K modelledShorts at 340.24–341.83 (+7.25%): ≈ $5,497 modelled238.48-25.00%270.28-15.00%302.08-5.00%333.88+5.00%365.67+15.00%397.47+25.00%TAO 317.98Model est-1.0+hl-2026-09-27-25x · ≥25× · estimate$55K$334K$110K$667KLongs at 305.26–306.85 (-3.75%): ≈ $2,296 modelledLongs at 306.85–308.44 (-3.25%): ≈ $5,672 modelledLongs at 308.44–310.03 (-2.75%): ≈ $12K modelledLongs at 310.03–311.62 (-2.25%): ≈ $32K modelledLongs at 311.62–313.21 (-1.75%): ≈ $54K modelledLongs at 313.21–314.80 (-1.25%): ≈ $66K modelledLongs at 314.80–316.39 (-0.75%): ≈ $97K modelledLongs at 316.39–317.98 (-0.25%): ≈ $60K modelledShorts at 319.57–321.16 (+0.75%): ≈ $10K modelledShorts at 321.16–322.75 (+1.25%): ≈ $19K modelledShorts at 322.75–324.34 (+1.75%): ≈ $44K modelledShorts at 324.34–325.93 (+2.25%): ≈ $59K modelledShorts at 325.93–327.52 (+2.75%): ≈ $53K modelledShorts at 327.52–329.11 (+3.25%): ≈ $37K modelledShorts at 329.11–330.70 (+3.75%): ≈ $85K modelledShorts at 330.70–332.29 (+4.25%): ≈ $110K modelledShorts at 332.29–333.88 (+4.75%): ≈ $101K modelledShorts at 333.88–335.47 (+5.25%): ≈ $66K modelledShorts at 335.47–337.06 (+5.75%): ≈ $37K modelledShorts at 337.06–338.65 (+6.25%): ≈ $24K modelledShorts at 338.65–340.24 (+6.75%): ≈ $17K modelledShorts at 340.24–341.83 (+7.25%): ≈ $5,497 modelled238.48-25.00%278.23-12.50%357.72+12.50%397.47+25.00%TAO 317.98Model est-1.0+hl-2026-09-27-25x · ≥25× · estimate
Longs liquidated (price falls)Shorts liquidated (price rises)Cumulative from the price outwards (right axis)

Model est-1.0+hl-2026-09-27-25x · High leverage (≥25×) · positions opened in the last 30 days. Each bar is 1.590 wide. Outside the chart: ≈ $0 of longs and $0 of shorts.

See how these levels built up over time on the TAO liquidation heatmap.

Densest long liquidation levels

below 317.98
PriceDistance≈ Modelled
314.80–316.39-0.75%$97K
313.21–314.80-1.25%$66K
316.39–317.98-0.25%$60K
311.62–313.21-1.75%$54K
310.03–311.62-2.25%$32K

Densest short liquidation levels

above 317.98
PriceDistance≈ Modelled
330.70–332.29+4.25%$110K
332.29–333.88+4.75%$101K
329.11–330.70+3.75%$85K
333.88–335.47+5.25%$66K
324.34–325.93+2.25%$59K

Modelled liquidations near the price

High leverage (≥25×) · last 30 days
Price moveLongs liquidated (price falls)Shorts liquidated (price rises)
±2%$278K$71K
±5%$330K$536K
±10%$330K$667K

How this estimate is made

Model est-1.0+hl-2026-09-27-25x

Inputs are the open interest, prices and volume this site records from Binance, Bybit, Hyperliquid, Bitget, Gate, HTX, MEXC, KuCoin. Every rise in open interest is booked as a new long and a new short at the period's volume-weighted price; falls in open interest close positions proportionally; positions also decay with a multi-day half-life; and a level is removed once the price trades through it (those are the "modelled liquidations"). Liquidation prices are spread over this distance-from-entry distribution, measured on real Hyperliquid positions and cut to positions at ≥25× leverage:

Liquidation distance from entryShare of new positions
0% – 2%12.0%
2% – 4%4.7%

Known limits: prices are last-trade bars averaged across exchanges, not mark prices; opens and closes inside one open-interest snapshot (5 minutes on Binance) cancel out; one distribution is used for every coin and both sides. USD values are "≈ modelled", best read as relative intensity. Full method and a daily accuracy scoreboard against real liquidations: liquidation heatmap methodology. Estimates may be materially wrong; not financial advice.

TAO liquidation map FAQ

Is this Bittensor liquidation map real data?

No, it is a model estimate. Exchanges do not publish where their users' positions would be liquidated, so every liquidation heatmap for Binance or Bybit (including the well-known ones) is a model. This one starts from real data: the open interest changes, prices and trading volume this site records from the exchanges' public APIs. Actual liquidations are usually lower, because most positions are closed long before they are liquidated.

How is it calculated?

Every rise in open interest is a new long and a new short, entered at that period's volume-weighted price. The model spreads their liquidation prices over a distance-to-liquidation distribution measured on real Hyperliquid positions (74.0% of new positions within 50% of entry; the rest are too far away or can't be liquidated). Falls in open interest close positions proportionally, positions also decay with a 5-day half-life, and a level is removed once the price trades through it. The model version on the chart says which formula and distribution were used.

What do the ranges and the ≥25× view mean?

The range is the replay window: the map shows positions opened in the last 12 hours to 30 days. All leverage uses the whole distribution; High leverage (≥25×) keeps only positions liquidated within 4% of their entry, the short-term levels that get hit first.

How is this different from the Hyperliquid liquidation map?

Hyperliquid is an on-chain exchange, so its positions and their liquidation prices are public. The TAO liquidation map on Hyperliquid adds up the real positions of tracked wallets on Hyperliquid only. This page is an estimate for all tracked exchanges together, Binance, Bybit and Hyperliquid included. Use both: where they agree, the level is more likely real.

Can I trade on it?

Treat it as context, not a signal. Clusters show where forced closes may bunch up if the price gets there; they don't predict that it will. Nothing here is financial advice, estimates may be materially wrong, and derivatives trading can lose more than your deposit.